How to measure the effectiveness of psychosocial risk control measures

Asset 5@2x
Insights.
The ultimate goal of psychosocial risk management is to prevent psychological injury among staff. However, when measuring the effectiveness of controls and interventions, it’s important to take a nuanced approach aligned with the unique risks present in each workplace.

Psychosocial risks are inherently complex and multifaceted. That’s because each employee’s experience of work is unique, shaped by both their personal circumstances and their workplace environment.

But how can an organisation assess whether they’ve effectively mitigated and eliminated psychosocial risks in their workplace? It all comes down to understanding how to measure the effectiveness of controls and pinpointing what success looks like.

In our third instalment of our three-part webinar series on how to measure the effectiveness of psychosocial risk management strategies, we spoke with Mark Oostergo (Chief Executive & Workplace Psychologist at Australian Psychological Services) and Katherine Morris (Health and Safety Specialist and Partner at Norton Rose Fulbright). They discussed:

  • How to measure the effectiveness of your harm prevention strategies.
  • Troubleshooting: What steps to take if your actions aren't yielding results?
  • Understanding the legal significance of evaluating and adjusting your approach.

 

Watch the full recording here, or catch up on the highlights below.

Why it’s important to measure the effectiveness of controls and interventions

Psychosocial risk management isn’t just about identifying hazards and implementing strategies to mitigate these risks. In fact, monitoring and assessing the effectiveness of your controls is arguably the most crucial part of the risk mitigation process.

“There’s emerging research that shows that the presence of psychosocial risks can have an effect on other aspects of work. At an individual level, that might be increasing the likelihood of psychological injury, or it can be counterproductive work behaviours, like a rise in an employee’s intent to leave.”

Mark Oostergo, Chief Executive & Workplace Psychologist at Australian Psychological Services.

There are many reasons why organisations need to be measuring the effectiveness of psychosocial risk management strategies, including:

  • Meet legal obligations: Regulators are very active in the psychosocial risk space and require organisations to demonstrate not only what controls they have in place but their effectiveness.
  • Focus on continuous improvement: The best way to assess what controls are and aren’t working is to conduct regular effectiveness monitoring. From there, companies can take targeted action to improve or adjust strategies to safeguard the health, safety and wellbeing of staff.
  • Proactively address emerging risks: By tracking organisational metrics, it’s possible to catch ‘red flags’ for psychosocial risks quickly and use early intervention tactics to prevent issues from escalating.
  • Boost organisational performance: By reducing the likelihood and impact of psychosocial risks, companies can make positive strides in increasing productivity levels, reducing staff turnover and even improving their organisational reputation.

“The legal risk in this area is high. It’s essential that organisations are actively considering the effectiveness of controls and are taking action if initiatives aren’t working. The main thing I would encourage people to do is take action, even imperfect action. The regulator will be much more impressed with that than an organisation that has done nothing on a particular issue.”

Katherine Morris, Health and Safety Specialist and Partner at Norton Rose Fulbright.

youtube-video-thumbnail
youtube icon

Four ways to assess the effectiveness of psychosocial risk interventions

According to Safe Work Australia’s framework, the final step in managing psychosocial hazards is regularly reviewing control measures. This involves giving employees channels to provide feedback on wellbeing initiatives and ways to report incidents.

The ultimate aim of reviewing controls is to assess whether an organisation is effectively mitigating and responding to psychosocial hazards in the workplace. Below, our experts share four practical ways businesses can proactively assess the impact of risk controls and interventions.

1. Establish an organisation’s psychosocial risk profile

To measure the impact of risk controls, organisations need to understand what risks are relevant to their workplace.

That’s why it’s crucial to develop a baseline of understanding when it comes to a company's risks and the key behaviours they’re trying to address. From there, organisations can come up with a tailored strategy to measure effectiveness.

“Psychosocial risk is dynamic. For a physical hazard (such as a fall from height risk), you can put simple measures in place to control that risk, such as barriers, because the risk is relatively static. But for psychosocial risk, there are so many contributing factors that change over time, which is why it’s important to use trend analysis to assess effectiveness over time.”

Mark Oostergo, Chief Executive & Workplace Psychologist at Australian Psychological Services.

Importantly, a company’s risk profile might change depending on the workers’ department or job title. For example, frontline workers may be exposed to different risks that may heighten their risk profile, which is why it’s important to not just adopt an organisational view but hone in on each role type.

“From a legal perspective, the key indicator of success is that there is a connection between the control measures put in place and the identified psychosocial risk, and then that there’s a tangible reduction in that risk.”

Katherine Morris, Health and Safety Specialist and Partner at Norton Rose Fulbright.

youtube-video-thumbnail
youtube icon

2. Choose the right organisational metrics to measure

Next, companies need to understand what organisational metrics will be used to measure the effectiveness of risk controls.

“Organisations are obligated to respond to the organisational metrics and data that they receive. There needs to be a dynamic engagement with the data and a systematic approach to how the data is received, interpreted and utilised.”

Katherine Morris, Health and Safety Specialist and Partner at Norton Rose Fulbright

Crucially, these metrics will vary depending on the identified risks an organisation is looking to address, from concern reporting stats to workers compensation claims and even return to work metrics.

“There’s no one-size-fits-all approach to monitoring organisational metrics. The real challenge I see across many organisations is they’ll have several different systems which makes it difficult to gather that data and put it into practical applications.

If an organisation is using an external service, like Sonder, it allows them to map utilisation against the company’s specific psychosocial risk profile to make use of this data.”

Mark Oostergo, Chief Executive & Workplace Psychologist at Australian Psychological Services.

3. Engage employees to gain real-world feedback

A key way to assess the effectiveness of controls is to speak directly with the people involved: employees.

By running regular surveys, focus groups and feedback pathways, companies can gain an understanding of how employees feel about the initiative and strategies that have been implemented, and whether it’s positively impacting their experience of work.

“When collecting employee feedback, it’s important to move away from generic lines of questioning, like ‘did you like X?’ and focus on targeted consultation to understand effectiveness and how certain initiatives have impacted employee’s experience of work.”

Mark Oostergo, Chief Executive & Workplace Psychologist at Australian Psychological Services.

youtube-video-thumbnail
youtube icon

4. Take action and respond to ineffective interventions

Reviewing effectiveness isn’t something that should only happen periodically. In fact, there may be situations when more reactive reviews are needed, such as when an incident has occurred, a new hazard has been identified or organisational change is likely to impact how people work.

But no matter when these reviews occur, it’s essential that companies take targeted action to address the findings of assessments, Rather than avoiding the issue or falling into a ‘sunk cost’ fallacy (a.k.a. Being hesitant to move away from an initiative due to a large investment of time or money), it’s important for organisations to stay curious, ask the right questions and take practical steps to refine and improve their risk mitigation strategies.

“In the eyes of the regulator, there must be a response if an implementation strategy isn’t proving effective. If the data is showing it’s not effective, then continuing to pursue it wouldn’t be defensible from a legal perspective.”

Katherine Morris, Health and Safety Specialist and Partner at Norton Rose Fulbright.

How Sonder can support your team in managing psychosocial risks

Promoting a supportive work environment is crucial to managing psychosocial hazards, mitigating psychosocial risks, and improving employee wellbeing. This can range from cultivating a culture of respect and inclusion, to implementing regular team-building activities, and upskilling leaders to recognise the early signs of burnout.

By addressing psychosocial hazards with urgency, employers can mitigate risks and create a more engaged and productive workforce. Ultimately, investing in the mental and emotional wellbeing of employees is an investment in the larger company, ensuring staff are motivated and able to bring their best selves to work.

youtube-video-thumbnail
youtube icon

With Sonder, personalised support is provided 24/7, so employees can access advice whenever needed. With a comprehensive app that offers a holistic suite of tools, employers can manage psychosocial hazards in the workplace and empower employees to make their health, wellbeing, and safety a priority.

*Source: September 2023, McGregor Tan survey of employees in Australia and New Zealand who were working a minimum of 30 hours per week.


About Sonder

Sonder is a technology company that helps organisations improve the wellbeing of their people so they perform at their best. Our mobile app provides immediate, 24/7 support from a team of safety, medical, and mental health professionals - plus onsite help for time-sensitive scenarios. Accredited by the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS), our platform gives leaders the insights they need to act on tomorrow's wellbeing challenges today.

Related posts

An employer’s best practice guide to implementing effective controls in psychosocial risk management

By understanding the best ways to implement effective controls, leaders can take a proactive approach to navigating psychosocial risks and create safer workplaces. Here we recap the most helpful tips from our expert webinar panel on navigating the control process.

Continue reading

How to navigate psychosocial risks to build a safer workplace

New regulatory changes mean Australian employers have extended obligations to safeguard employee mental health and wellbeing. To help you navigate the changes, we recap the highlights from the first webinar in our series on navigating psychosocial risk management.

Continue reading

How to manage psychosocial hazards at work

As companies look to retain top talent and make employee health a priority, the need to identify and manage psychosocial hazards has never been more important. This blog has expert advice to help you manage them.

Continue reading

Employee wellbeing data like you’ve never seen it before

Increasingly, P&C leaders are under pressure to identify and act on new initiatives that drive lasting, positive outcomes for the wellbeing, health and safety of their people. And despite the proliferation of data sources, the age old question remains; Where…

Continue reading

How does empowering your employees lead to better outcomes?

The concept of empowerment is “rooted in the 1960s ideology of social action, which embraces community change, capacity building, and collectivity”. But, the term “empowerment” comes from American psychologist, Julian Rappaport, who in 1981 articulated it to describe the process…

Continue reading
The ripple effect cost of lost productivity across multiple workplaces is hidden but substantial.

What is the ripple effect costing organisations?

Organisations are leaking millions of dollars each year in absenteeism, presenteeism, workers’ compensation, employee turnover, and the ripple effect of lost productivity from colleagues and family members – all because many employees are not well. What is this costing organisations…

Continue reading

There's so much more to share

Sonder is reimagining health, safety and wellbeing support. Sonder proves human centric care leads to earlier intervention. Sonder impacts one person at a time to drive meaningful change across an organisation. Sonder understands people and how to support them.

iPhone app mockups_About Us