
Low employee uptake of workplace mental health support has largely been accepted with minimal inquiry. But with this year’s release of ISO 45003 and the subsequent spotlight on workplace psychological health and safety, it’s time for organisations to ask why their employee support programs have as low as a five per cent uptake, as well as how they can enact their duty of care to meet contemporary employee demands.
Few employers review the relevance and effectiveness of their workplace support programs in a regular or timely manner. With this in mind, we recently joined with PwC Australia to explore why workplace mental health support programs have such a low uptake. Our report proposed the following three reasons:
- It’s not built into the culture;
- Solutions are not the right fit; and
- Poor past experiences.
This post shares an excerpt of the second reason – “solutions are not the right fit” – from our joint report, Rethinking workplace mental health and wellbeing.
Excerpt from our Sonder-PwC Australia report
This report explores three reasons for the low uptake of workplace mental health support.
Reason two: solutions are not the right fit
Many workplace mental health supports are still reliant on traditional EAPs and a one-size-fits-all model, despite a growing expectation for more contemporary services that are better suited to employee needs, modern job design, and industry challenges.
Modern offerings encourage proactive prevention and early intervention. They offer flexibility, professional support, and involve consultation with employees and stakeholders to redesign the whole experience to support people better.