Digital self-help tools are one way to conveniently provide round-the-clock help for shift workers who need support for their safety, mental, and physical wellbeing. They are a great tool for people who cannot easily access in-hours support, and who do not have a family member, friend, or colleague available to check on their wellbeing at regular intervals during the work day. But, self-help apps alone are not enough.
Research by Rudd and Beidas, published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), found that while self-help apps can provide valuable initial guidance, they should enhance a more holistic and comprehensive employee wellbeing strategy, not be the strategy.
Beware: lack of ongoing engagement
Self-help apps risk user drop-off. This can result in delays to care or the absence of care (if there is no human support or ongoing follow-up).
“Widely celebrated as the solution to the supply and demand imbalance in mental health care, digital mental health interventions have flooded the marketplace to supplement specialty mental health care. However, the evidence supporting their efficacy is mixed [see also here], and engagement with digital mental health interventions, particularly mobile apps that lack ancillary human interaction, is abysmal. Users are unlikely to use these interventions more than a few times,” conclude Rudd and Beidas.
Carlo, Ghomi, Renn and Areán concur; “the vast majority [of health apps] remain largely unevaluated… [and] even when apps are evidence-based, their public health impact is often curbed by poor adherence”.
“Furthermore, the movement of specialty mental health care, an intensive public health intervention, from the hands of clinicians and into standalone digital interventions ignores decades of research about the importance of social support and may further isolate individuals who need human connection the most.
Given the robust social support literature, it is not surprising that digital interventions with the highest levels of engagement are those that include some form of human interaction,” said Rudd and Beidas.