Key question: What is a ‘good’ rate of employee uptake?
An employee support programme can only deliver results if employees use it. Understandably, people leaders increasingly demand evidence to prove employee utilisation rates.
These heightened expectations align with a rise in employee expectations. Now more than ever, employees want their employers to step up and share the responsibility for their wellbeing. For many, their health and safety depend on it. If they cannot talk to a doctor in a medical emergency, speak with a psychologist or clinician when they are feeling suicidal, or access family and domestic violence leave when their situation at home has become untenable, their lives can be at risk.
Senior executive interest has also spiked. Leaders need employees to be safe and well because organisations lose millions of dollars each year in absenteeism, presenteeism, workers’ compensation, employee turnover, and the ripple effect of lost productivity from colleagues and family members.
Insider tip
Ask providers how they define “utilisation rate.” Is it mobile app downloads, digital interactions, integrations (which can give a misleading “100%” rate), human interactions, counselling sessions, or something else?
- 3-5% is the typical uptake of traditional EAPs
- 40+%* is a best-practice uptake of EAPs or EAP alternatives like Sonder
Average utilisation rates
The average utilisation rate for EAP services across the United Kingdom is typically quoted as around 3-5%.
However, these figures do not account for:
- Higher utilisation rates with EAP alternatives
EAP alternatives (such as Sonder) – which often enjoy higher utilisation rates – aren’t currently included in EAP industry figures.
Some sectors see a lower average utilisation rate (e.g., retail trade, construction, and manufacturing). Some sectors see a higher average utilisation rate (e.g. financial and insurance, government, and utilities).
Modern health providers and counselling helplines reported a rise in the use of their services when the COVID-19 pandemic upended lives and incomes.
Did you know?
The difference in utilisation rates can be huge. Most providers see up to 5% of employees using their services. Alternatives (such as Sonder) see 40%.
- Best&Less went from three to 146 employees reaching out for support in one month by changing to an EAP alternative.
- Probe CX went from a three to 51% employee uptake over three months by switching to an EAP alternative.
- Woolworths Group found that 56% of their employees who reached out for help would not have sought support at all without the EAP alternative they provided.
Utilisation rates can improve with a one-stop-for-help model – which simplifies support for employees when needed, and builds employee trust across all of the services offered.